Ham, the Magic of Downtown

From the chaos of Park Yard to the revival of Nakivubo Channel, Hamis Kiggundu’s developments are reshaping downtown Kampala, turning overlooked spaces into engines of business and urban growth.

Uganda’s Billionaires 2026: Wealth, Assets and Power

Uganda’s Billionaires 2026 highlight how concentrated asset...

Uganda’s Debt Nears Shs116 Trillion as Treasury Defends Sustainability Plan

Uganda’s national debt has surged to approximately...

Court Upholds Media Ban in Kayanja Defamation Trial

Date:

The High Court upheld the media ban in the Kayanja defamation trial, confirming that it will remain until the case ends. Principal Magistrate Adams Byarugaba issued the directive on April 5, 2024, restricting live audio and video broadcasts during the trial involving Pastor Robert Kayanja and nine other individuals.

Justice David Matovu emphasized that the restriction preserves the trial’s integrity and ensures fair proceedings. The accused face serious charges, including conspiracy to defeat justice and giving false information to the police.

Two of the accused, Alex Wakamala and Jamilu Mwandha, challenged the directive. They claimed that the media ban infringed on their right to a public hearing, especially since the prosecution’s side received extensive media coverage. Wakamala added that the order damaged their reputations.

Lawyers Boniface Lukwago and Ronald Ssali argued that media restrictions must apply only in exceptional cases. They cited Articles 28 and 126(2) of the Ugandan Constitution to support their case.

State attorneys Jonathan Muwaganya and Caroline Mpumwire countered the challenge. They explained that several social media posts distorted witness testimonies and sensationalized the trial. Mpumwire warned that such coverage undermines the judicial process.

Justice Matovu supported the trial magistrate’s approach. He pointed to a prior instance in November 2023 when the court limited media access to protect a sensitive witness. He clarified that the court had not entirely banned media coverage; verified journalists still had access and could publish written reports.

The judge criticized the applicants for waiting nearly ten months before filing their complaint. He noted that they continued participating in the trial under the ban, yet delayed seeking legal redress. “Lifting the directive now would lead to fragmented media coverage and compromise witness security,” Matovu said.

Justice Matovu also reminded all parties of the importance of respecting a magistrate’s discretion in courtroom management. He reaffirmed that the media ban will remain in force as the defence prepares its case.

The Kayanja defamation trial will continue under these guidelines, with further hearings scheduled in the coming weeks.

Read: Elias Lukwago Nalukoola Appeals MP Seat Annulment in Court


Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Ham, the Magic of Downtown

From the chaos of Park Yard to the revival of Nakivubo Channel, Hamis Kiggundu’s developments are reshaping downtown Kampala, turning overlooked spaces into engines of business and urban growth.

Uganda’s Billionaires 2026: Wealth, Assets and Power

Uganda’s Billionaires 2026 highlight how concentrated asset ownership continues...

Uganda’s Debt Nears Shs116 Trillion as Treasury Defends Sustainability Plan

Uganda’s national debt has surged to approximately Shs116 trillion,...

Motsepe Confirms Afcon 2027 Is On Track, Backs East Africa Hosts

Patrice Motsepe has firmly ruled out any possibility of...